{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/deep-learning-approach-for-dynamic-sampling","title":"Deep Learning Approach for Dynamic Sampling for Multichannel Mass Spectrometry Imaging","arxiv_id":"2210.13415","date":"2022-10-24","proceeding":null,"authors":["David Helminiak","Hang Hu","Julia Laskin","Dong Hye Ye"],"abstract":"Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MSI), using traditional rectilinear scanning, takes hours to days for high spatial resolution acquisitions. Given that most pixels within a sample's field of view are often neither relevant to underlying biological structures nor chemically informative, MSI presents as a prime candidate for integration with sparse and dynamic sampling algorithms. During a scan, stochastic models determine which locations probabilistically contain information critical to the generation of low-error reconstructions. Decreasing the number of required physical measurements thereby minimizes overall acquisition times. A Deep Learning Approach for Dynamic Sampling (DLADS), utilizing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and encapsulating molecular mass intensity distributions within a third dimension, demonstrates a simulated 70% throughput improvement for Nanospray Desorption Electrospray Ionization (nano-DESI) MSI tissues. Evaluations are conducted between DLADS and a Supervised Learning Approach for Dynamic Sampling, with Least-Squares regression (SLADS-LS) and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) network (SLADS-Net). When compared with SLADS-LS, limited to a single m/z channel, as well as multichannel SLADS-LS and SLADS-Net, DLADS respectively improves regression performance by 36.7%, 7.0%, and 6.2%, resulting in gains to reconstruction quality of 6.0%, 2.1%, and 3.4% for acquisition of targeted m/z.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13415v1","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.13415v1.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"abstracts"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"deep-learning-approach-for-dynamic-sampling","repo_url":"https://github.com/yatagarasu50469/slads","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"tf","reach":null}],"tasks":[{"task_slug":"deep-learning","task_name":"Deep Learning"},{"task_slug":"regression-1","task_name":"regression"}],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}