{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/cost-driven-screening-of-network-constraints","title":"Cost-driven Screening of Network Constraints for the Unit Commitment Problem","arxiv_id":"2104.05746","date":"2021-04-12","proceeding":null,"authors":["Álvaro Porras","Salvador Pineda","Juan M. Morales","Asunción Jiménez-Cordero"],"abstract":"In an attempt to speed up the solution of the unit commitment (UC) problem, both machine-learning and optimization-based methods have been proposed to lighten the full UC formulation by removing as many superfluous line-flow constraints as possible. While the elimination strategies based on machine learning are fast and typically delete more constraints, they may be over-optimistic and result in infeasible UC solutions. For their part, optimization-based methods seek to identify redundant constraints in the full UC formulation by exploring the feasibility region of an LP-relaxation. In doing so, these methods only get rid of line-flow constraints whose removal leaves the feasibility region of the original UC problem unchanged. In this paper, we propose a procedure to substantially increase the line-flow constraints that are filtered out by optimization-based methods without jeopardizing their appealing ability of preserving feasibility. Our approach is based on tightening the LP-relaxation that the optimization-based method uses with a valid inequality related to the objective function of the UC problem and hence, of an economic nature. The result is that the so strengthened optimization-based method identifies not only redundant line-flow constraints but also inactive ones, thus leading to more reduced UC formulations.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.05746v3","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.05746v3.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"cost-driven-screening-of-network-constraints","repo_url":"https://github.com/groupoasys/Cost-driven_Screening_Method_Data","is_official":0,"mentioned_in_paper":0,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"none","reach":{"status":"ok","spdx":"GPL-3.0"}}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus=2104.05746","mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}