{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/communication-efficient-distributed-deep-1","title":"A Quantitative Survey of Communication Optimizations in Distributed Deep Learning","arxiv_id":"2005.13247","date":"2020-05-27","proceeding":null,"authors":["Shaohuai Shi","Zhenheng Tang","Xiaowen Chu","Chengjian Liu","Wei Wang","Bo Li"],"abstract":"Nowadays, large and complex deep learning (DL) models are increasingly trained in a distributed manner across multiple worker machines, in which extensive communications between workers pose serious scaling problems. In this article, we present a quantitative survey of communication optimization techniques for data parallel distributed DL. We first identify the major communication challenges and classify the existing solutions into three levels, namely the learning algorithm, the system architecture, and the network infrastructure. We present the state-of-the-art communication optimization techniques and conduct a comparative study of seven common lossless distributed DL methods on a 32-GPU cluster with 100Gbps InfiniBand (IB). We show that (1) the DL models with low model intensity (such as BERT and BERT-Large) are difficult to scale out even with the best available lossless algorithm over 100Gbps IB; (2) the system architecture and scheduling algorithms have a critical impact on the scaling property. We conclude the article with discussions on the open issues for further investigations.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.13247v2","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.13247v2.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"abstracts"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"communication-efficient-distributed-deep-1","repo_url":"https://github.com/HKBU-HPML/ddl-benchmarks","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"pytorch","reach":null}],"tasks":[{"task_slug":"deep-learning","task_name":"Deep Learning"},{"task_slug":null,"task_name":"GPU"},{"task_slug":"scheduling","task_name":"Scheduling"}],"methods":[{"method_slug":"adam","method_name":"Adam"},{"method_slug":"attention","method_name":"Attention"},{"method_slug":"attention-dropout","method_name":"Attention Dropout"},{"method_slug":"bert","method_name":"BERT"},{"method_slug":"dense-connections","method_name":"Dense Connections"},{"method_slug":"dropout","method_name":"Dropout"},{"method_slug":"layer-normalization","method_name":"Layer Normalization"},{"method_slug":"linear-layer","method_name":"Linear Layer"},{"method_slug":"linear-warmup-with-linear-decay","method_name":"Linear Warmup With Linear Decay"},{"method_slug":"multi-head-attention","method_name":"Multi-Head Attention"},{"method_slug":"residual-connection","method_name":"Residual Connection"},{"method_slug":"softmax","method_name":"Softmax"},{"method_slug":"weight-decay","method_name":"Weight Decay"},{"method_slug":"wordpiece","method_name":"WordPiece"}],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}