{"about":{"non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","site":"https://codewithpapers.app","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page","syntology":{"site":"https://syntology.ai","developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","mcp":{"server":"https://syntology.ai/mcp","transport":"streamable-http","server_card":"https://syntology.ai/.well-known/mcp/server-card.json","auth":{"type":"trial token, no account","trial_token":"https://syntology.ai/api/oauth/trial/token","method":"POST","docs":"https://syntology.ai/developers"}},"have":"https://syntology.ai/api/graph/have?x=<method, arXiv id or title> (free, answers coverage only)","paper_base":"https://syntology.ai/paper/","atlas_base":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus="},"machine_readable":[{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/llms.txt","what":"the machine catalog: every machine-readable file, counted"},{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/index/manifest.json","what":"paper-to-code index by arXiv id, with Syntology's counts"},{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/search/manifest.json","what":"site search index (titles, authors) and its files"},{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/download","what":"bulk files: Syntology's layer, described there"},{"url":"https://codewithpapers.app/build_manifest.json","what":"the build record: inputs, counts, exclusions, probes"}]},"url":"/paper/arxiv-2609-29429","title":"Just Ask Jev: Reinforcement Learning for Calibrated Decisions as a Zero-Shot Detector of AI Alignment Failures","arxiv_id":"2609.29429","date":"2026-09-24","proceeding":null,"authors":["Ruoqi Guo","Yi Liu","Gelei Deng","Yuekang Li","Lida Zhao","Yutao Wu","Simin Chen","Ying Zhang","Leo Yu Zhang"],"abstract":"Detectors of alignment failures screen deployed language models and score alignment benchmarks. Most are generative judges that spend a decoding pass on every criterion, and classifiers that read token probabilities, such as Llama Guard, still score one fixed label per call. Jev, a model trained with reinforcement learning for calibrated decisions (RLCD), answers many typed questions about one input with calibrated probabilities in a single call. Whether it detects alignment failures has not been measured. We present RLCDAlignBench, which benchmarks Jev on ten alignment failures: sycophancy, jailbreaks, deception, prompt injection, hallucination, privacy violation, social bias, reward hacking, concealing uncertainty, and power seeking. It spans 44 benchmarks and five target models, labelled by each benchmark's scorer and, on two, by humans. Many of these failures are relational, defined against a reference, such as the user's belief or an injected instruction, that the response alone does not reveal. Our key idea is therefore to vary what Jev is asked separately from what it sees: the question's wording and answer type on one side, the fields of the input on the other. A single generic question reaches a median AUROC of 0.886 zero-shot and beats supervised baselines on most benchmarks. Question wording matters little, while context matters more, mostly through fields that encode the label. Jev matches the reference scorer's agreement with human labels, surfaces label defects in existing benchmarks, and costs 63x less than LLM-judge scorers. Code and data: https://github.com/sumleo/RLCDAlignBench.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29429","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.29429","source":{"archive":null,"snapshot":"2025-07-28","note":"not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen at the snapshot)","row_kind":"graph","title_abstract_authors_date":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)"},"code_links":[],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"syntology_url":"https://syntology.ai/paper/2609.29429","atlas_url":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus=2609.29429","mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","held":true,"reason":"in_graph_layer","checked_against":null,"agent_calls":[{"tool":"get_citation_path","arguments":{"paper_1":"2609.29429"},"arguments_in":{"paper_2":"another paper's arXiv id or title"},"call":"get_citation_path(paper_1=\"2609.29429\", paper_2=\"…\")"},{"tool":"get_concepts_for_paper","arguments":{"arxiv_id":"2609.29429"},"call":"get_concepts_for_paper(arxiv_id=\"2609.29429\")"}],"by_repo":[{"repo":"sumleo/RLCDAlignBench","kind":"found_in_text","samples":0,"ran":0,"instrument":0,"unverified":0}],"by_repo_is":"one row per repository in the archive's code links, Syntology's graph links or the samples; samples 0 means no sample is linked to this paper, a statement about Syntology's coverage, not about the repository: with harvested_for_other_papers present, Syntology harvested the repository for that many other papers, and without it, Syntology harvested nothing from it; placed_by_identical_code counts samples whose link records no repository, placed here because identical code was harvested from this repository for another paper; ran counts executions on a synthesized input and instrument counts failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code","read_at":"2026-09-28T10:30:06+00:00","read_at_is":"when the build read Syntology's graph, not when any sample ran","ran_record":{"url":"https://syntology.ai/api/ran/2609.29429.json","schema":"syntology.ran_record/1","counts_crosswalk":{"n_samples":"syntology.counts.lifted","n_ran":"syntology.counts.executed","n_ran_checked":"syntology.counts.checked","n_instrument":"syntology.counts.instrument_failures","n_unverified":"syntology.counts.no_recorded_run"},"note":"live record, measured at request time; may be newer than this page's graph read","badge":"https://syntology.ai/api/ran/2609.29429.svg"},"claim":"Per-sample execution status on synthesized fixtures; not a correctness claim about the paper. Samples come from repositories linked to the paper, official or community; repo_kind says which.","repos":[{"mentioned_in_github":null,"is_official":null,"provenance":"deterministic:regex_extraction","mentioned_in_paper":null,"url":"https://github.com/sumleo/RLCDAlignBench","reach":null}],"summary":{},"n_samples":0,"n_ran":0,"n_constructed":0,"n_ran_checked":0,"n_instrument":0,"n_unverified":0,"n_instrument_is":"failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code","every_run_is_an_instrument_failure":false,"key_notes":{"n_ran_checked":"legacy name, kept unchanged so existing readers do not break: it counts the samples that ran with no instrument failure (honoured, violated, and ran with no contract checked); it does not mean a contract was checked, and the pages print it as 'K with no instrument failure', not 'K checked'","n_constructed":"a sub-count of the samples that ran, never subtracted from them and never a failure: an executed sample whose run returned an instance of its own class (fixture_out_type equals the entry name): the run built an object and did not compute a result (Syntology's RAN record, counts.constructed)"},"by_repo_kind":{},"repo_kind_vocabulary":{"official":"The archive marks this repository official for the paper","named_in_paper":"The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official","listed":"In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper","found_in_text":"Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted","community":"Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested"},"n_pointer_only_for_licence":0,"samples":[]},"code_links_note":"this paper is newer than the archive, which holds no code links for it; its repositories, from Syntology's graph, are under syntology.repos","arxiv_metadata":{"licence":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)","fields":["title","abstract","authors","date"],"primary_category":"cs.AI","source":"arxiv_daily_20260925.json"},"syntology_extracted_results":{"kind":"leaderboard_placements","source":"Syntology's leaderboard-shaped extractor over the paper's own arXiv-HTML tables: a model pointed at a cell, the number was read from that cell and checked against the board's metric, dataset, split and scale, and an independent check accepted the entry; not reviewed by the paper's authors or the archive's editors","extractor_model":"global.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-v1:0","verifier_model":null,"prompt_sha":"fa63d4bb9d755694","coverage":{"sentence":"Syntology has checked 8,886 of the 9,662 papers on this site that are newer than the archive (for 3,717 of them no archive leaderboard matched the paper's tables, so there was nothing further to check); 733 were read and have nothing to place (arXiv has no HTML version of the paper, or that version has no tables), 41 could not be read (the extractor's reply could not be parsed), and results from the other 2 appear after they are checked.","papers_newer_than_archive":9662,"papers_checked":8886,"papers_read_nothing_to_place":733,"papers_could_not_be_read":41},"entries":[],"judged_to_report_on":{"model":"Claude Sonnet 4.5","model_as_recorded":"global.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-v1:0","note":"a model's judgement from the paper's own tables, not a result; outcome is what Syntology's checks did with it; reason is the rules' plain words, only for refused_by_rule","boards":[{"leaderboard":"/sota/summarization-consistency-evaluation-on","slug":"summarization-consistency-evaluation-on","task":"Summarization Consistency Evaluation","dataset":"AggreFact","outcome":"refused_by_rule","reason":"the row label the model quoted is not the row's label"}]},"not_placed":{"boards":1,"rejected_by_independent_check":0,"refused_by_a_rule":1,"check_did_not_answer":0,"proposed_without_a_cell":0,"declined_by_site":0}},"record_sha256":"faff58e10ac1422e0d8c60b4f2dbdff80e82f51a5efd876ee188d904a82474b9","record_changed_at":"2026-09-28","record_changed_at_basis":"first_hashed"}