{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/arxiv-2607-17266","title":"Debate-on-Graph: Reliable and Adaptive Reasoning of Large Language Model on Uncertain Knowledge Graph","arxiv_id":"2607.17266","date":"2026-07-19","proceeding":null,"authors":["Peiji Yu","Xin Chen","Tianxing Wu"],"abstract":"Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing. However, LLMs often suffer from hallucinations and lack of relevant knowledge when dealing with question answering (QA) tasks. To mitigate these issues, knowledge graphs (KGs) have been utilized to enhance LLM reasoning. Nevertheless, KGs often contain noise and errors, while existing KG-enhanced LLM approaches are generally unable to identify and filter such noisy and erroneous content, which can instead amplify hallucinations and pose challenges for reliable reasoning. Uncertain knowledge graphs (UKGs), which associate each triple with a confidence score to quantify uncertainty, offer a promising direction to address this challenge. Compared with prior work, we investigate how to leverage UKGs to support LLMs for QA. We propose Debate-on-Graph (DoG), a new framework that enables LLMs and UKGs to collaborate adaptively for reliable reasoning. Specifically, we first design a heuristic search algorithm tailored for UKGs to extract reliable and question-relevant subgraphs, thereby reducing noise and errors in retrieved knowledge. We then introduce a Multi-Agent Debate mechanism, which yields reliable answers through adaptive adversarial debates, aiming to fully exploit the knowledge in UKGs while preserving the reliability of retrieved evidence. Extensive experiments on four benchmark QA datasets show that DoG achieves state-of-the-art performance over existing LLM reasoning methods and KG-based baselines, while enabling reliable and adaptive reasoning. Our code is available at https://github.com/seucoin/Debate-on-Graph.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17266","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.17266","source":{"archive":null,"snapshot":"2025-07-28","note":"not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen at the snapshot)","row_kind":"graph","title_abstract_authors_date":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)"},"code_links":[],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus=2607.17266","mcp":{"get_harvested_code_for_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17266"}},"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","read_at":"2026-09-24T18:15:14+00:00","read_at_is":"when the build read Syntology's graph, not when any sample ran","claim":"Per-sample execution status on synthesized fixtures; not a correctness claim about the paper. Samples come from repositories linked to the paper, official or community; repo_kind says which.","repos":[{"mentioned_in_github":null,"is_official":null,"provenance":"deterministic:regex_extraction","mentioned_in_paper":null,"url":"https://github.com/seucoin/Debate-on-Graph","reach":null}],"summary":{"ran":3},"by_repo_kind":{"found_in_text":{"samples":3,"ran":3,"repositories":1}},"repo_kind_vocabulary":{"official":"The archive marks this repository official for the paper","named_in_paper":"The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official","listed":"In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper","found_in_text":"Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted","community":"Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested"},"n_pointer_only_for_licence":0,"samples":[{"code_sha256_prefix":"4d221e4225a71d5a","entry":"debater_extract_letter","repo":"seucoin/Debate-on-Graph","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"utils.py","file_url":"https://github.com/seucoin/Debate-on-Graph/blob/HEAD/utils.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"Apache-2.0","inline_ok":true,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"4d221e4225a71d5a"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"f9f2dcce0d65bd93","entry":"get_question_and_options","repo":"seucoin/Debate-on-Graph","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"utils.py","file_url":"https://github.com/seucoin/Debate-on-Graph/blob/HEAD/utils.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"Apache-2.0","inline_ok":true,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"f9f2dcce0d65bd93"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"a1cd290aa3a56e02","entry":"moderator_extract_letter","repo":"seucoin/Debate-on-Graph","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"utils.py","file_url":"https://github.com/seucoin/Debate-on-Graph/blob/HEAD/utils.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"Apache-2.0","inline_ok":true,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"a1cd290aa3a56e02"}}]},"arxiv_metadata":{"licence":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)","fields":["title","abstract","authors","date"],"primary_category":"cs.CL","source":"arxiv_2026.jsonl"},"syntology_extracted_results":{"kind":"leaderboard_placements","source":"Syntology's leaderboard-shaped extractor over the paper's own arXiv-HTML tables: a model pointed at a cell, the number was read from that cell and checked against the board's metric, dataset, split and scale, and an independent check accepted the entry; not reviewed by the paper's authors or the archive's editors","extractor_model":"global.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-v1:0","verifier_model":"global.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-v1:0","prompt_sha":"fa63d4bb9d755694","coverage":{"sentence":"Syntology has checked 6,264 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.","papers_newer_than_archive":9581,"papers_checked":6264},"entries":[{"leaderboard":"/sota/common-sense-reasoning-on-commonsenseqa","task":"Common Sense Reasoning","dataset":"CommonsenseQA","model":"DoG (Ours) · GPT","row_label":"DoG (Ours)","configuration":"GPT","configuration_in_model":true,"configuration_not_shown_because":null,"values":{"Accuracy":"86.0"},"where_in_paper":"Table 2, row “DoG (Ours)”","caption_head":"Table 2 : Accuracy (%) comparison of DoG and DoG-E with different baselines on…","cells":[{"column":"Accuracy","cell_text":"86.0","column_header":"CSQA / GPT","table_index_0based":1,"row":13,"col":2}]},{"leaderboard":"/sota/question-answering-on-medqa-usmle","task":"Question Answering","dataset":"MedQA","model":"DoG (Ours) · GPT","row_label":"DoG (Ours)","configuration":"GPT","configuration_in_model":true,"configuration_not_shown_because":null,"values":{"Accuracy":"81.5"},"where_in_paper":"Table 2, row “DoG (Ours)”","caption_head":"Table 2 : Accuracy (%) comparison of DoG and DoG-E with different baselines on…","cells":[{"column":"Accuracy","cell_text":"81.5","column_header":"MedQA / GPT","table_index_0based":1,"row":13,"col":8}]}],"not_placed":{"boards":2,"rejected_by_independent_check":2,"refused_by_a_rule":0,"check_did_not_answer":0,"proposed_without_a_cell":0,"declined_by_site":0}}}