{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/arxiv-2606-24188","title":"Aspect-Based Sentiment Evolution and its Correlation with Review Rounds in Multi-Round Peer Reviews: A Deep Learning Approach","arxiv_id":"2606.24188","date":"2026-06-23","proceeding":null,"authors":["Ruxue Hana","Haomin Zhoua","Jiangtao Zhong","Chengzhi Zhang"],"abstract":"Mining sentiment information from the textual content of peer review comments offers valuable insights into the scientific evaluation process. However, previous studies are often constrained by coarse-grained analysis and the lack of differentiation across review rounds. Notably, the dynamic shifts in reviewers' focus and sentiment tendencies throughout multiple review stages remain underexplored. To address this gap, the present study investigates the distribution and evolution of aspect-level sentiments and examines their correlation with the number of review rounds. We begin by segmenting the multi-round review comments of 11,063 accepted papers from Nature Communications and identifying fine-grained review aspect clusters. A manually annotated corpus of approximately 5,000 review sentences is then constructed. Using this dataset, we train a series of deep learning-based aspect sentiment classification models. Among them, the LCF-BERT-CDM model achieves the best performance, with a Macro-F1 score of 82.65%. Subsequent statistical analysis reveals a consistent trend: as the number of review rounds increases, the proportion of positive sentiments rises, while negative sentiments decline. Correlation analysis further indicates that aspect sentiment scores are negatively associated with the total number of review rounds. Key aspects exhibiting stronger correlations include \"experiments\", \"research significance\" and \"result analysis\".","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24188","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.24188","source":{"archive":null,"snapshot":"2025-07-28","note":"not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen at the snapshot)","row_kind":"graph","title_abstract_authors_date":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)"},"code_links":[],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus=2606.24188","mcp":{"get_harvested_code_for_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.24188"}},"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","read_at":"2026-09-24T18:15:14+00:00","read_at_is":"when the build read Syntology's graph, not when any sample ran","claim":"Per-sample execution status on synthesized fixtures; not a correctness claim about the paper. Samples come from repositories linked to the paper, official or community; repo_kind says which.","repos":[{"mentioned_in_github":null,"is_official":null,"provenance":"deterministic:regex_extraction","mentioned_in_paper":null,"url":"https://github.com/RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC","reach":null}],"summary":{"ran":5},"by_repo_kind":{"found_in_text":{"samples":5,"ran":5,"repositories":1}},"repo_kind_vocabulary":{"official":"The archive marks this repository official for the paper","named_in_paper":"The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official","listed":"In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper","found_in_text":"Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted","community":"Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested"},"n_pointer_only_for_licence":5,"samples":[{"code_sha256_prefix":"65cbc3d8be205081","entry":"get_dir_path","repo":"RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"Code/Round_Split.py","file_url":"https://github.com/RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC/blob/HEAD/Code/Round_Split.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":true,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"65cbc3d8be205081"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"3baef1961fc043b8","entry":"get_new_review","repo":"RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"Code/Review_Sentence.py","file_url":"https://github.com/RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC/blob/HEAD/Code/Review_Sentence.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"3baef1961fc043b8"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"132594a5062a8a02","entry":"get_txtdict","repo":"RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"Code/Round_Split.py","file_url":"https://github.com/RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC/blob/HEAD/Code/Round_Split.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"132594a5062a8a02"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"1b10fbcf02853370","entry":"read_txt","repo":"RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"Code/Round_Split.py","file_url":"https://github.com/RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC/blob/HEAD/Code/Round_Split.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"1b10fbcf02853370"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"b747c9cbd974b029","entry":"walkFile","repo":"RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"Code/Aspect_Sentiment_Score.py","file_url":"https://github.com/RuxueHan/Aspect-Sentiment-Analysis-of-Peer-Review-in-NC/blob/HEAD/Code/Aspect_Sentiment_Score.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":true,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"b747c9cbd974b029"}}]},"arxiv_metadata":{"licence":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)","fields":["title","abstract","authors","date"],"primary_category":"cs.CL","source":"arxiv_2026.jsonl"},"syntology_extracted_results":{"kind":"leaderboard_placements","source":"Syntology's leaderboard-shaped extractor over the paper's own arXiv-HTML tables: a model pointed at a cell, the number was read from that cell and checked against the board's metric, dataset, split and scale, and an independent check accepted the entry; not reviewed by the paper's authors or the archive's editors","extractor_model":"global.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-v1:0","verifier_model":null,"prompt_sha":"fa63d4bb9d755694","coverage":{"sentence":"Syntology has checked 6,264 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.","papers_newer_than_archive":9581,"papers_checked":6264},"entries":[],"not_placed":{"boards":0,"rejected_by_independent_check":0,"refused_by_a_rule":0,"check_did_not_answer":0,"proposed_without_a_cell":0,"declined_by_site":0}}}