{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/arxiv-2606-23871","title":"Federated Survival Analysis in Healthcare: A Multi-Model Evaluation on Cross-Institutional Heterogeneous Breast Cancer Data","arxiv_id":"2606.23871","date":"2026-06-22","proceeding":null,"authors":["Natalia Moreno-Blasco","Anusha Ihalapathirana","Pekka Siirtola","Miguel Fernandez-de-Retana"],"abstract":"Survival analysis is central to clinical decision-making, yet reliable time-to-event models require large, diverse cohorts that are rarely available at a single institution, while privacy regulations restrict the centralization of patient data. Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving alternative by training shared models without exchanging raw data, but its effectiveness for survival modeling under realistic, heterogeneous conditions remains insufficiently understood. This paper presents a systematic, multi-model evaluation of federated survival analysis on a cross-institutional breast cancer cohort with naturally heterogeneous distributed clients. Three representative survival models, the Cox Proportional Hazards model, DeepSurv, and Random Survival Forest (RSF), are compared across centralized, local, and federated training, and three federated optimization strategies (FedAvg, FedProx, and FedAdam) are assessed for the gradient-based models. Results show that FL consistently outperforms local training and approaches, and occasionally exceeds, centralized performance, while RSF offers the best overall balance of discrimination, calibration, and robustness across heterogeneous clients. We further find that performance depends on the diversity of client distributions, and that FedAvg and FedProx are stronger and more stable than FedAdam. Based on these findings, we derive practical, decision-oriented guidelines mapping data, privacy, interpretability, and resource constraints to recommended model and training-paradigm choices for federated survival modeling in healthcare.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23871","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.23871","source":{"archive":null,"snapshot":"2025-07-28","note":"not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen at the snapshot)","row_kind":"graph","title_abstract_authors_date":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)"},"code_links":[],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":{"get_harvested_code_for_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.23871"}},"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","read_at":"2026-09-24T18:15:14+00:00","read_at_is":"when the build read Syntology's graph, not when any sample ran","claim":"Per-sample execution status on synthesized fixtures; not a correctness claim about the paper. Samples come from repositories linked to the paper, official or community; repo_kind says which.","repos":[{"mentioned_in_github":null,"is_official":null,"provenance":"deterministic:regex_extraction","mentioned_in_paper":null,"url":"https://github.com/nataliamorenob/Survival-Models-in-Federated-Healthcare-Settings","reach":null}],"summary":{"ran":4},"by_repo_kind":{"found_in_text":{"samples":4,"ran":4,"repositories":1}},"repo_kind_vocabulary":{"official":"The archive marks this repository official for the paper","named_in_paper":"The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official","listed":"In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper","found_in_text":"Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted","community":"Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested"},"n_pointer_only_for_licence":4,"samples":[{"code_sha256_prefix":"a6fa052cf706e8b5","entry":"aggregate_evaluate_metrics","repo":"nataliamorenob/Survival-Models-in-Federated-Healthcare-Settings","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"src/Training_Modes/Federated_Learning/strategies.py","file_url":"https://github.com/nataliamorenob/Survival-Models-in-Federated-Healthcare-Settings/blob/HEAD/src/Training_Modes/Federated_Learning/strategies.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"a6fa052cf706e8b5"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"cd0d1c64778ce2e5","entry":"compute_ylim","repo":"nataliamorenob/Survival-Models-in-Federated-Healthcare-Settings","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"Paper_plots/plot_figure1_multimodel_client_counts.py","file_url":"https://github.com/nataliamorenob/Survival-Models-in-Federated-Healthcare-Settings/blob/HEAD/Paper_plots/plot_figure1_multimodel_client_counts.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"cd0d1c64778ce2e5"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"b65c43118273752d","entry":"get_nb_max_rounds","repo":"nataliamorenob/Survival-Models-in-Federated-Healthcare-Settings","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"src/config.py","file_url":"https://github.com/nataliamorenob/Survival-Models-in-Federated-Healthcare-Settings/blob/HEAD/src/config.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"b65c43118273752d"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"59514d7e3fcfc6ba","entry":"get_weights","repo":"nataliamorenob/Survival-Models-in-Federated-Healthcare-Settings","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"src/Training_Modes/Federated_Learning/task.py","file_url":"https://github.com/nataliamorenob/Survival-Models-in-Federated-Healthcare-Settings/blob/HEAD/src/Training_Modes/Federated_Learning/task.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"59514d7e3fcfc6ba"}}]},"arxiv_metadata":{"licence":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)","fields":["title","abstract","authors","date"],"primary_category":"cs.LG","source":"arxiv_2026.jsonl"},"syntology_extracted_results":{"kind":"leaderboard_placements","source":"Syntology's leaderboard-shaped extractor over the paper's own arXiv-HTML tables: a model pointed at a cell, the number was read from that cell and checked against the board's metric, dataset, split and scale, and an independent check accepted the entry; not reviewed by the paper's authors or the archive's editors","extractor_model":"global.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-v1:0","verifier_model":null,"prompt_sha":"fa63d4bb9d755694","coverage":{"sentence":"Syntology has checked 6,264 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.","papers_newer_than_archive":9581,"papers_checked":6264},"entries":[],"not_placed":{"boards":0,"rejected_by_independent_check":0,"refused_by_a_rule":0,"check_did_not_answer":0,"proposed_without_a_cell":0,"declined_by_site":0}}}