{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/arxiv-2605-23414","title":"When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems","arxiv_id":"2605.23414","date":"2026-05-22","proceeding":"ICML","authors":["Zehao Wang","Shilong Jin","Zhao Cao","Lanjun Wang"],"abstract":"LLM-based multi-agent systems can fail even when planned actions are executed correctly because agents may misjudge their knowledge when evaluating plan feasibility, a phenomenon we term epistemic miscalibration in planning. Unlike execution errors, epistemic miscalibration is latent during planning, as generated plans can remain self-consistent and executable without observable errors; the miscalibration is also dynamic, as new information can alter feasibility assessments, potentially obscuring past miscalibration signals and causing them to recur over time. To address this, we propose the Epistemic Planning Calibration Agentic Workflow (EPC-AW), which assesses whether plans remain supported under varying information conditions rather than directly verifying feasibility. EPC-AW employs Information-consistency-based Plan Selection, selecting plans whose evaluations are stable across agents, together with Consistency-guided Epistemic State Refinement to adapt calibration over time by leveraging past discrepancies to guide future planning. Experiments show that EPC-AW improves system-level success by an average of 9.75%.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23414","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.23414","source":{"archive":null,"snapshot":"2025-07-28","note":"not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen at the snapshot)","row_kind":"graph","title_abstract_authors_date":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)"},"code_links":[],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"syntology_url":null,"atlas_url":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus=2605.23414","mcp":{"get_harvested_code_for_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.23414"}},"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","read_at":"2026-09-24T18:15:14+00:00","read_at_is":"when the build read Syntology's graph, not when any sample ran","claim":"Per-sample execution status on synthesized fixtures; not a correctness claim about the paper. Samples come from repositories linked to the paper, official or community; repo_kind says which.","repos":[{"mentioned_in_github":null,"is_official":null,"provenance":"deterministic:regex_extraction","mentioned_in_paper":null,"url":"https://github.com/wzhSteve/EPC-AW","reach":null}],"summary":{"ran":1,"ran_draft_wrong":1},"by_repo_kind":{"found_in_text":{"samples":2,"ran":2,"repositories":1}},"repo_kind_vocabulary":{"official":"The archive marks this repository official for the paper","named_in_paper":"The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official","listed":"In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper","found_in_text":"Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted","community":"Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested"},"n_pointer_only_for_licence":2,"samples":[{"code_sha256_prefix":"b9f5b9aaa47e5aa8","entry":"Solver","repo":"wzhSteve/EPC-AW","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"MAS/epc_aw/solver.py","file_url":"https://github.com/wzhSteve/EPC-AW/blob/HEAD/MAS/epc_aw/solver.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"b9f5b9aaa47e5aa8"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"b7420cec3f6260f9","entry":"make_json_serializable_truncated","repo":"wzhSteve/EPC-AW","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"MAS/epc_aw/solver.py","file_url":"https://github.com/wzhSteve/EPC-AW/blob/HEAD/MAS/epc_aw/solver.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran_draft_wrong","verification_level":1,"contract_check":"OUTPUT_MISDECLARED","metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"b7420cec3f6260f9"}}]},"arxiv_metadata":{"licence":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)","fields":["title","abstract","authors","date"],"primary_category":"cs.LG","source":"arxiv_2026.jsonl"},"syntology_extracted_results":{"kind":"leaderboard_placements","source":"Syntology's leaderboard-shaped extractor over the paper's own arXiv-HTML tables: a model pointed at a cell, the number was read from that cell and checked against the board's metric, dataset, split and scale, and an independent check accepted the entry; not reviewed by the paper's authors or the archive's editors","extractor_model":"global.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-v1:0","verifier_model":"us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-v1:0","prompt_sha":"fa63d4bb9d755694","coverage":{"sentence":"Syntology has checked 6,795 of the 9,581 papers on this site that are newer than the archive; results from the others appear after they are checked.","papers_newer_than_archive":9581,"papers_checked":6795},"entries":[{"leaderboard":"/sota/question-answering-on-bamboogle","task":"Question Answering","dataset":"Bamboogle","model":"EPC-AW","row_label":"EPC-AW","configuration":"Acc.","configuration_in_model":false,"configuration_not_shown_because":"names_the_metric","values":{"Accuracy":"58.13"},"where_in_paper":"Table 1, row “EPC-AW”","caption_head":"Table 1 : Accuracy (%) comparison of different repair methods. \\Delta denotes…","cells":[{"column":"Accuracy","cell_text":"58.13","column_header":"Bamboogle / Acc.","table_index_0based":0,"row":5,"col":1}]},{"leaderboard":"/sota/question-answering-on-medqa-usmle","task":"Question Answering","dataset":"MedQA","model":"EPC-AW","row_label":"EPC-AW","configuration":"Acc.","configuration_in_model":false,"configuration_not_shown_because":"names_the_metric","values":{"Accuracy":"74.11"},"where_in_paper":"Table 1, row “EPC-AW”","caption_head":"Table 1 : Accuracy (%) comparison of different repair methods. \\Delta denotes…","cells":[{"column":"Accuracy","cell_text":"74.11","column_header":"MedQA / Acc.","table_index_0based":0,"row":5,"col":11}]}],"not_placed":{"boards":0,"rejected_by_independent_check":0,"refused_by_a_rule":0,"check_did_not_answer":0,"proposed_without_a_cell":0,"declined_by_site":0}}}