{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/arxiv-2605-11205","title":"The Scaling Law of Evaluation Failure: Why Simple Averaging Collapses Under Data Sparsity and Item Difficulty Gaps, and How Item Response Theory Recovers Ground Truth Across Domains","arxiv_id":"2605.11205","date":"2026-05-11","proceeding":null,"authors":["Jung Min Kang"],"abstract":"Benchmark evaluation across AI and safety-critical domains overwhelmingly relies on simple averaging. We demonstrate that this practice produces substantially misleading rankings when two conditions co-occur: (1) the evaluation matrix is sparse and (2) items vary substantially in difficulty. Through controlled simulation experiments across four domains -- NLP (GLUE), clinical drug trials, autonomous vehicle safety, and cybersecurity -- we show that Spearman rank correlation $ρ$ between simple-average rankings and ground-truth rankings degrades from $ρ= 1.000$ at 100% coverage to $ρ= 0.809$ at 67% coverage with high difficulty heterogeneity (mean over 20 seeds). A standard two-parameter logistic (2PL) Item Response Theory (IRT) model maintains $ρ\\geq 0.996$ across all conditions. A 150-condition grid sweep over sparsity $S \\in [0, 0.70]$ and difficulty gap $D \\in [0.5, 5.0]$ confirms that ranking error forms a failure surface with a strong $S \\times D$ interaction ($γ_3 = +0.20$, $t = 13.05$), while IRT maintains $ρ\\geq 0.993$ throughout. We discuss implications for Physical AI benchmarking, where evaluation matrices are often incomplete and difficulty gaps are extreme.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11205","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.11205","source":{"archive":null,"snapshot":"2025-07-28","note":"not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen at the snapshot)","row_kind":"graph","title_abstract_authors_date":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)"},"code_links":[],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus=2605.11205","mcp":{"get_harvested_code_for_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.11205"}},"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","read_at":"2026-09-24T18:15:14+00:00","read_at_is":"when the build read Syntology's graph, not when any sample ran","claim":"Per-sample execution status on synthesized fixtures; not a correctness claim about the paper. Samples come from repositories linked to the paper, official or community; repo_kind says which.","repos":[{"mentioned_in_github":null,"is_official":null,"provenance":"deterministic:regex_extraction","mentioned_in_paper":null,"url":"https://github.com/testofschool/evaluation-failure-scaling-law","reach":null}],"summary":{"ran":3},"by_repo_kind":{"found_in_text":{"samples":3,"ran":3,"repositories":1}},"repo_kind_vocabulary":{"official":"The archive marks this repository official for the paper","named_in_paper":"The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official","listed":"In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper","found_in_text":"Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted","community":"Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested"},"n_pointer_only_for_licence":3,"samples":[{"code_sha256_prefix":"42f7705fbb1dadc7","entry":"gen_difficulties","repo":"testofschool/evaluation-failure-scaling-law","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"src/grid_sweep_final.py","file_url":"https://github.com/testofschool/evaluation-failure-scaling-law/blob/HEAD/src/grid_sweep_final.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NOASSERTION","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"42f7705fbb1dadc7"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"85f6b2bfc56691bf","entry":"gen_mask_biased","repo":"testofschool/evaluation-failure-scaling-law","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"src/grid_sweep_final.py","file_url":"https://github.com/testofschool/evaluation-failure-scaling-law/blob/HEAD/src/grid_sweep_final.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NOASSERTION","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"85f6b2bfc56691bf"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"080fdebc944d9bc9","entry":"gen_mask_mcar","repo":"testofschool/evaluation-failure-scaling-law","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"src/grid_sweep_final.py","file_url":"https://github.com/testofschool/evaluation-failure-scaling-law/blob/HEAD/src/grid_sweep_final.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NOASSERTION","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"080fdebc944d9bc9"}}]},"arxiv_metadata":{"licence":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)","fields":["title","abstract","authors","date"],"primary_category":"cs.LG","source":"arxiv_2026.jsonl"},"syntology_extracted_results":null}