{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/arxiv-2605-06576","title":"On the Safety of Graph Representation Learning","arxiv_id":"2605.06576","date":"2026-05-07","proceeding":null,"authors":["Xiaoguang Guo","Zehong Wang","Ziming Li","Shawn Spitzel","Soonwoo Kwon","Tianyi Ma","Yanfang Ye","Chuxu Zhang"],"abstract":"Graph representation learning (GRL) has evolved from topology-only graph embeddings to task-specific supervised GNNs, and more recently to reusable representations and graph foundation models (GFMs). However, existing evaluations mainly measure clean transfer, adaptation, and task coverage. It remains unclear whether GRL methods stay reliable when deployment stresses affect graph signals, graph contexts, label support, structural groups, or predictive evidence. We introduce GRL-Safety, a multi-axis safety evaluation benchmark for GRL. GRL-Safety evaluates twelve representative methods, spanning topology-only embedding methods, supervised GNNs, self-supervised graph models, and GFMs, on twenty-five graph datasets under standardized evaluation conditions while preserving method-native adaptation. The evaluation covers five safety axes: corruption robustness, OOD generalization, class imbalance, fairness, and interpretation, with per-axis and sub-condition reporting rather than a single aggregate score. Our analysis yields three cross-axis insights that can inspire future research. First, safety behavior is shaped by the interaction between representation design and the stressed graph factor, rather than by method family alone. Second, foundation-era methods show axis-specific strengths rather than broad safety dominance. Third, several deployment regimes remain difficult even for the best evaluated method, revealing capability gaps that require new robustness, adaptation, or training objectives beyond model selection. The benchmark, evaluation protocols, and code are available at: https://github.com/GXG-CS/GRL-Safety.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06576","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.06576","source":{"archive":null,"snapshot":"2025-07-28","note":"not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen at the snapshot)","row_kind":"graph","title_abstract_authors_date":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)"},"code_links":[],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus=2605.06576","mcp":{"get_harvested_code_for_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.06576"}},"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","read_at":"2026-09-24T18:15:14+00:00","read_at_is":"when the build read Syntology's graph, not when any sample ran","claim":"Per-sample execution status on synthesized fixtures; not a correctness claim about the paper. Samples come from repositories linked to the paper, official or community; repo_kind says which.","repos":[{"mentioned_in_github":null,"is_official":null,"provenance":"deterministic:regex_extraction","mentioned_in_paper":null,"url":"https://github.com/GXG-CS/GRL-Safety","reach":null}],"summary":{"ran":1,"ran_draft_wrong":1,"unverified":1},"by_repo_kind":{"found_in_text":{"samples":3,"ran":2,"repositories":1}},"repo_kind_vocabulary":{"official":"The archive marks this repository official for the paper","named_in_paper":"The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official","listed":"In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper","found_in_text":"Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted","community":"Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested"},"n_pointer_only_for_licence":3,"samples":[{"code_sha256_prefix":"f07d191127bf8656","entry":"LlagaConfig","repo":"GXG-CS/GRL-Safety","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"sgb/models/gfm/llaga/model.py","file_url":"https://github.com/GXG-CS/GRL-Safety/blob/HEAD/sgb/models/gfm/llaga/model.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran","verification_level":1,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"f07d191127bf8656"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"582ea445fe47134a","entry":"_build_projector","repo":"GXG-CS/GRL-Safety","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"sgb/models/gfm/llaga/model.py","file_url":"https://github.com/GXG-CS/GRL-Safety/blob/HEAD/sgb/models/gfm/llaga/model.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"ran_draft_wrong","verification_level":1,"contract_check":"OUTPUT_MISDECLARED","metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"582ea445fe47134a"}},{"code_sha256_prefix":"7288e1a137b996f7","entry":"LlagaNDEncoder","repo":"GXG-CS/GRL-Safety","repo_kind":"found_in_text","path":"sgb/models/gfm/llaga/model.py","file_url":"https://github.com/GXG-CS/GRL-Safety/blob/HEAD/sgb/models/gfm/llaga/model.py","link_basis":"first_harvest_node","language":"python","status":"unverified","verification_level":0,"contract_check":null,"metamorphic_tier":null,"behaviour_fingerprint":false,"licence":"NONE","inline_ok":false,"mcp_get_code":{"code_sha256":"7288e1a137b996f7"}}]},"arxiv_metadata":{"licence":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)","fields":["title","abstract","authors","date"],"primary_category":"cs.LG","source":"arxiv_2026.jsonl"},"syntology_extracted_results":null}