{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/arxiv-2603-27331","title":"SACRED: A Faithful Annotated Multimedia Multimodal Multilingual Dataset for Classifying Connectedness Types in Online Spirituality","arxiv_id":"2603.27331","date":"2026-03-28","proceeding":null,"authors":["Qinghao Guan","Yuchen Pan","Donghao Li","Zishi Zhang","Yiyang Chen","Lu Li","Flaminia Canu","Emilia Volkart","Gerold Schneider"],"abstract":"In religion and theology studies, spirituality has garnered significant research attention for the reason that it not only transcends culture but offers unique experience to each individual. However, social scientists often rely on limited datasets, which are basically unavailable online. In this study, we collaborated with social scientists to develop a high-quality multimedia multi-modal datasets, \\textbf{SACRED}, in which the faithfulness of classification is guaranteed. Using \\textbf{SACRED}, we evaluated the performance of 13 popular LLMs as well as traditional rule-based and fine-tuned approaches. The result suggests DeepSeek-V3 model performs well in classifying such abstract concepts (i.e., 79.19\\% accuracy in the Quora test set), and the GPT-4o-mini model surpassed the other models in the vision tasks (63.99\\% F1 score). Purportedly, this is the first annotated multi-modal dataset from online spirituality communication. Our study also found a new type of connectedness which is valuable for communication science studies.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.27331","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.27331","source":{"archive":null,"snapshot":"2025-07-28","note":"not in the Papers with Code archive (frozen at the snapshot)","row_kind":"graph","title_abstract_authors_date":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)"},"code_links":[],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":"https://app.syntology.ai/?focus=2603.27331","mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers","read_at":"2026-09-24T18:15:14+00:00","read_at_is":"when the build read Syntology's graph, not when any sample ran","claim":"Per-sample execution status on synthesized fixtures; not a correctness claim about the paper. Samples come from repositories linked to the paper, official or community; repo_kind says which.","repos":[{"mentioned_in_github":null,"is_official":null,"provenance":"deterministic:regex_extraction","mentioned_in_paper":null,"url":"https://github.com/NitinN77/quora-plus-bypass","reach":{"status":"ok"}}],"summary":{},"by_repo_kind":{},"repo_kind_vocabulary":{"official":"The archive marks this repository official for the paper","named_in_paper":"The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official","listed":"In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper","found_in_text":"Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted","community":"Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested"},"n_pointer_only_for_licence":0,"samples":[]},"arxiv_metadata":{"licence":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license)","fields":["title","abstract","authors","date"],"primary_category":"cs.CL","source":"arxiv_2026.jsonl"},"syntology_extracted_results":null}