{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/adaptive-contrastive-learning-with-dynamic","title":"Adaptive Contrastive Learning with Dynamic Correlation for Multi-Phase Organ Segmentation","arxiv_id":"2210.08652","date":"2022-10-16","proceeding":null,"authors":["Ho Hin Lee","Yucheng Tang","Han Liu","Yubo Fan","Leon Y. Cai","Qi Yang","Xin Yu","Shunxing Bao","Yuankai Huo","Bennett A. Landman"],"abstract":"Recent studies have demonstrated the superior performance of introducing ``scan-wise\" contrast labels into contrastive learning for multi-organ segmentation on multi-phase computed tomography (CT). However, such scan-wise labels are limited: (1) a coarse classification, which could not capture the fine-grained ``organ-wise\" contrast variations across all organs; (2) the label (i.e., contrast phase) is typically manually provided, which is error-prone and may introduce manual biases of defining phases. In this paper, we propose a novel data-driven contrastive loss function that adapts the similar/dissimilar contrast relationship between samples in each minibatch at organ-level. Specifically, as variable levels of contrast exist between organs, we hypothesis that the contrast differences in the organ-level can bring additional context for defining representations in the latent space. An organ-wise contrast correlation matrix is computed with mean organ intensities under one-hot attention maps. The goal of adapting the organ-driven correlation matrix is to model variable levels of feature separability at different phases. We evaluate our proposed approach on multi-organ segmentation with both non-contrast CT (NCCT) datasets and the MICCAI 2015 BTCV Challenge contrast-enhance CT (CECT) datasets. Compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, our proposed contrastive loss yields a substantial and significant improvement of 1.41% (from 0.923 to 0.936, p-value$<$0.01) and 2.02% (from 0.891 to 0.910, p-value$<$0.01) on mean Dice scores across all organs with respect to NCCT and CECT cohorts. We further assess the trained model performance with the MICCAI 2021 FLARE Challenge CECT datasets and achieve a substantial improvement of mean Dice score from 0.927 to 0.934 (p-value$<$0.01). The code is available at: https://github.com/MASILab/DCC_CL","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.08652v1","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.08652v1.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"abstracts"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"adaptive-contrastive-learning-with-dynamic","repo_url":"https://github.com/masilab/dcc_cl","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":0,"framework":"pytorch","reach":null}],"tasks":[{"task_slug":"computed-tomography-ct","task_name":"Computed Tomography (CT)"},{"task_slug":"contrastive-learning","task_name":"Contrastive Learning"},{"task_slug":"organ-segmentation","task_name":"Organ Segmentation"}],"methods":[{"method_slug":"contrastive-learning","method_name":"Contrastive Learning"}],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}