{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/a-brief-tutorial-on-transformation-based","title":"A Brief Tutorial on Transformation Based Markov Chain Monte Carlo and Optimal Scaling of the Additive Transformation","arxiv_id":"1307.1446","date":"2013-07-04","proceeding":null,"authors":["Kushal Kumar Dey","Sourabh Bhattacharya"],"abstract":"We consider the recently introduced Transformation-based Markov Chain Monte Carlo (TMCMC) (Dutta and Bhattacharya (2014)), a methodology that is designed to update all the parameters simultaneously using some simple deterministic transformation of a onedimensional random variable drawn from some arbitrary distribution on a relevant support. The additive transformation based TMCMC is similar in spirit to random walk Metropolis, except the fact that unlike the latter, additive TMCMC uses a single draw from a onedimensional proposal distribution to update the high-dimensional parameter. In this paper, we first provide a brief tutorial on TMCMC, exploring its connections and contrasts with various available MCMC methods. Then we study the diffusion limits of additive TMCMC under various set-ups ranging from the product structure of the target density to the case where the target is absolutely continuous with respect to a Gaussian measure; we also consider the additive TMCMC within Gibbs approach for all the above set-ups. These investigations lead to appropriate scaling of the one-dimensional proposal density. We also show that the optimal acceptance rate of additive TMCMC is 0.439 under all the aforementioned set-ups, in contrast with the well-established 0.234 acceptance rate associated with optimal random walk Metropolis algorithms under the same set-ups. We also elucidate the ramifications of our results and clear advantages of additive TMCMC over random walk Metropolis with ample simulation studies and Bayesian analysis of a real, spatial dataset with which 160 unknowns are associated.","url_abs":"http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.1446v6","url_pdf":"http://arxiv.org/pdf/1307.1446v6.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"a-brief-tutorial-on-transformation-based","repo_url":"https://github.com/kkdey/tmcmcR","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}