{"about":{"site":"https://codewithpapers.app","non_affiliation":"Code with Papers and Syntology are not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Papers with Code, Meta, or the pwc-archive mirror.","licence":"CC BY-SA 4.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","attribution":"https://codewithpapers.app/attribution","modified":"archive material modified by Syntology; see the attribution page"},"url":"/paper/4-ogc-catalog-of-gravitational-waves-from","title":"4-OGC: Catalog of gravitational waves from compact-binary mergers","arxiv_id":"2112.06878","date":"2021-12-13","proceeding":null,"authors":["Alexander H. Nitz","Sumit Kumar","Yi-Fan Wang","Shilpa Kastha","Shichao Wu","Marlin Schäfer","Rahul Dhurkunde","Collin D. Capano"],"abstract":"We present the fourth Open Gravitational-wave Catalog (4-OGC) of binary neutron star (BNS), binary black hole (BBH) and neutron star-black hole (NSBH) mergers. The catalog includes observations from 2015-2020 covering the first through third observing runs (O1, O2, O3a, O3b) of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. The updated catalog includes 7 BBH mergers which were not previously reported with high significance during O3b for a total of 94 observations: 90 BBHs, 2 NSBHs, and 2 BNSs. The most confident new detection, GW200318_191337, has component masses $49.1^{+16.4}_{-12.0}\\textrm{M}_\\odot$ and $31.6^{+12.0}_{-11.6}\\textrm{M}_\\odot$; its redshift of $0.84^{+0.4}_{-0.35}$ ($90\\%$ credible interval) may make it the most distant merger so far. We estimate the merger rate of BBH sources, assuming a powerlaw mass distribution containing an additive Gaussian peak, to be $16.5_{-6.2}^{+10.4} (25.0_{-8.0}^{+12.6})$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$ at a redshift of $z=0$ ($0.2$). For BNS and NSBH sources, we estimate a merger rate of $200^{+309}_{-148}$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$ and $19^{+30}_{-14}$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$, respectively, assuming the known sources are representative of the total population. We provide reference parameter estimates for each of these sources using an up-to-date model accounting for instrumental calibration uncertainty. The corresponding data release also includes our full set of sub-threshold candidates.","url_abs":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06878v2","url_pdf":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.06878v2.pdf","source":{"archive":"pwc-archive (Hugging Face), CC BY-SA 4.0","snapshot":"2025-07-28","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode","row_kind":"links_only","authors_date_abstract":"arXiv metadata, CC0 1.0 (https://info.arxiv.org/help/license), from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12"},"code_links":[{"paper_slug":"4-ogc-catalog-of-gravitational-waves-from","repo_url":"https://github.com/gwastro/4-ogc","is_official":1,"mentioned_in_paper":1,"mentioned_in_github":1,"framework":"none","reach":null}],"tasks":[],"methods":[],"datasets_introduced":[],"methods_introduced":[],"results":[],"syntology":{"syntology_url":null,"atlas_url":null,"mcp":null,"developers":"https://syntology.ai/developers"},"arxiv_metadata":null,"syntology_extracted_results":null}